You receive a tax assessment decision or a contravention report from ANAF. The first reaction of most taxpayers is one of the following: I will pay to get rid of the problem, or I will go and talk to the inspector to see what can be done.
Both reactions are wrong.
An ANAF decision is not a final judgment. It is an administrative act that can be challenged and that, in many cases, deserves to be challenged. ANAF is not always right. Tax inspectors work under the pressure of collection targets, sometimes interpret legislation in favour of the state, and make procedural errors that can invalidate the act issued.
The success rate of tax challenges in Romania both in the administrative procedure and in court is significant. Not all taxpayers win, but many obtain substantial reductions in the amounts assessed or complete annulment of the challenged act.
The problem is that very few taxpayers challenge ANAF decisions. And of those who do, many act too late or incorrectly.
Why an ANAF decision is not automatically correct
There is a widespread perception that if ANAF has issued a decision, it reflects fiscal reality and the only option is to accept and pay.
This perception is wrong for several concrete reasons.
Tax inspectors interpret legislation: and Romanian tax legislation is complex, contradictory in some respects, and constantly changing. There are situations where the same transaction can reasonably be interpreted in several ways — and ANAF invariably chooses the interpretation that generates the largest additional tax.
Tax inspections have strict deadlines and procedures : which ANAF must comply with. Failure to follow the inspection procedure from communicating the inspection order to the duration of the inspection and the taxpayer’s right to be heard can render the act issued void, regardless of the substance of the fiscal issue.
The documentation analysed may be incomplete : tax inspectors work with the documents available to them. If you did not present all relevant documents during the inspection, there is the possibility of supplementing the file during the challenge phase.
The amounts assessed may be incorrectly calculated: arithmetic errors and errors in applying tax rates exist in practice, particularly in complex files with many transactions.
Types of ANAF acts that can be challenged
I will not go into exhaustive technical classifications, what is important to understand is that the range of challengeable ANAF acts is broader than most taxpayers realise.
Tax assessment decisions issued following fiscal inspections can be challenged those establishing additional taxes and levies beyond what was declared. Decisions calculating late payment interest and penalties can be challenged. Contravention reports the actual fines for non-compliance with formal obligations can be challenged. Decisions establishing the tax base through estimation where ANAF calculates taxes using indirect methods in the absence of documentation can be challenged. Precautionary measures preventive garnishments and seizures on the taxpayer’s assets which can paralyse a company’s operations before any tax debt is definitively established, can be challenged.
The last category precautionary measures is often ignored by taxpayers, even though it is sometimes the most urgent problem to resolve. A garnishment on your company’s bank accounts can be challenged and suspended if there are solid legal arguments.
Deadlines — the only thing that does not forgive
If there is one single thing to remember from this article, it is that deadlines in tax matters are strict and that missing them has consequences that cannot be remedied afterwards.
I will not list all applicable deadlines these vary depending on the type of act being challenged and the stage of the procedure. What is essential to understand is the general structure.
There is a deadline for filing the administrative challenge submitted to ANAF. There is a deadline for approaching the court after the administrative challenge has been resolved or left unresolved. There are intermediate deadlines within each procedure.
Each of these deadlines is a forfeiture deadline not a limitation period. This means that missing them cannot be justified afterwards by any circumstance and that the ANAF act becomes final and enforceable with no possibility of appeal.
If you have received an act from ANAF and do not know how much time you have to challenge it this is the first thing you must verify, today, not next week.
The two stages of the challenge — the general picture
Challenging an ANAF act typically goes through two distinct stages, each with its own logic and its own stakes.
The administrative stage is mandatory and takes place within ANAF the challenge is filed with the issuing fiscal body or the hierarchically superior structure, depending on the type of act. This stage is filtered by ANAF itself which means the success rate is lower than in court, but a well-founded challenge can resolve the problem without judicial costs.
The judicial stage follows if the administrative challenge has been dismissed or if ANAF has not responded within the legal deadline. Tax litigation is heard by the administrative courts tribunals and courts of appeal and has a different dynamic from ordinary civil litigation.
The two stages are not hermetically separate the arguments built in the administrative challenge directly influence the position in court. This is why the way you formulate the administrative challenge matters as much as the court action sometimes more.
The mistakes that cost taxpayers the most
From the experience of representing clients in tax litigation, there are several mistakes we see repeatedly that turn winnable situations into costly defeats.
Paying before analysis
The first and most frequent mistake. The taxpayer receives the ANAF decision, is frightened by the large amount, and pays immediately to avoid additional interest and penalties. Payment is not an error in itself but payment without prior analysis of the act means permanently losing the right to challenge the amounts paid if it is later found that ANAF was wrong.
There are mechanisms for recovering overpaid amounts but they are more complex and more uncertain than a challenge filed before payment.
Filing the challenge alone without preparation
Many taxpayers file administrative challenges themselves, believing it is sufficient to explain the actual situation. A tax challenge is not an explanatory letter it is a legal act that must identify the specific defects of the challenged act, invoke the correct legal basis, and present arguments in the appropriate form and order.
A poorly drafted challenge can lose winning arguments that a lawyer would have identified, or can create implicit admissions of facts that will be used against the taxpayer in subsequent stages.
Ignoring precautionary measures
A company that receives a bank account garnishment or asset seizure tends to focus on challenging the underlying tax and to ignore challenging the precautionary measure itself. The two procedures are separate and have separate deadlines. The precautionary measure can and must be challenged immediately independently of the challenge to the main act if there are arguments that it was applied unlawfully or is disproportionate to the claimed debt.
Informal communication with the tax inspector
Informal discussions with the tax inspector phone calls, unofficial meetings, verbal promises about resolving the situation have no legal value and can be dangerous. Everything that matters in tax proceedings is recorded in writing. An inspector’s verbal promises do not protect you and can create a false sense of security that causes you to miss critical deadlines.
Tacit acceptance through inaction
The simplest way to lose the right to challenge an ANAF act is to do nothing. Deadlines run regardless of whether you received the act, read it, or agree with it. Inaction is equivalent to acceptance.
Signals that the ANAF decision is worth challenging
Not every ANAF decision is wrong and not every challenge is a winner. But there are several questions every taxpayer can ask themselves to assess whether the situation warrants analysis by a specialist.
Question 1: Was the inspection procedure followed correctly? Did you receive the inspection order with the legally required advance notice? Did the inspection last longer than the law permits? Were you heard before the decision was issued? Any procedural irregularity is a potential challenge argument.
Question 2: Does the assessed amount correspond to the reality of your transactions? If the figure in the ANAF decision does not resemble the accounting and commercial reality of your business not because you concealed anything, but because the inspector used incomplete data or made calculation errors it is worth investigating.
Question 3: Did ANAF apply the most unfavourable interpretation of an ambiguous provision? Tax legislation has areas of ambiguity where there is contradictory case law. If the decision is based on an interpretation that courts have rejected in other cases, there are challenge arguments.
Question 4: Is the amount significant relative to the cost of challenging it? For small amounts, the procedural cost may exceed the potential benefit. For significant amounts from a few tens of thousands of lei upwards legal analysis is almost always justified.
Question 5: Do you have all the documents supporting your position? If during the inspection you did not present all relevant documents whether because you could not find them in time or because you did not realise they were important there is the possibility of presenting them during the challenge phase. It is never too late to organise your file, as long as the deadlines have not expired.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every tax situation has its own particularities and requires specific analysis before deciding whether and how to challenge an ANAF act. Contact a specialist lawyer before paying or signing any document.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I challenge an ANAF decision if I have already paid the assessed amount? Yes, but the procedure is more complex. Payment does not extinguish the right to challenge, but it changes the stakes you are no longer challenging to avoid payment, but to recover overpaid amounts. There are legal mechanisms for recovering amounts paid in excess, but the deadlines and conditions are different from the standard challenge.
What happens to interest and penalties while the challenge is pending? Filing the administrative challenge generally suspends enforcement of the challenged act ANAF cannot initiate enforcement while the challenge is pending. Interest and penalties may continue to accrue depending on the situation. There is also the possibility of requesting the court to suspend enforcement of the act during the tax litigation.
ANAF has placed a garnishment on my company’s bank accounts. What do I do now? A bank account garnishment is a precautionary measure that can paralyse your company’s operations. There are procedures for challenging the precautionary measure that are separate from challenging the underlying tax assessment. Act immediately the sooner you contact a lawyer, the greater the chances of suspending or lifting the garnishment quickly.
Can I negotiate with ANAF a reduction of the assessed amount? Romanian tax procedure does not provide for informal negotiations regarding the amount of taxes assessed unlike some other jurisdictions. There are however formal procedures the administrative challenge, court action through which amounts can be reduced or annulled if there are solid legal arguments. There are no reductions through informal negotiation.
I received the ANAF act two weeks ago and have done nothing. Can I still do something? It depends on the type of act and the applicable deadline. In some cases you may still have time in others the deadline may already have expired or be about to expire. Urgently verify the deadline applicable to your act this verification is not done tomorrow, it is done today.
Have you received a decision or fine from ANAF and want to know whether it is worth challenging and what your chances are?
Request a Legal Assessment: we respond within 24 hours on business days.
[ Request Legal Assessment ] [ +40 720 530 400 ]
